Many local authorities in remote and rural areas have identified that suppliers are failing to meet warranty service level agreements (SLAs) for reacting to chargepoint faults. SLAs will specify acceptable response and repair periods but challenges with obtaining parts and arranging technicians to site have been cited as reasons for delays.
Local authorities have fed back that suppliers are leaving faults uncorrected for prolonged periods for logistical efficiency reasons. Suppliers have indicated they prefer to group together site visits to more remote regions to minimise the associated technician travel and accommodation costs.
Fault resolution has sometimes required several e-mails and phone calls, a very resource intensive process for councils. Which is often exacerbated by having multiple equipment providers operating within their boundary.
It is understood that suppliers might not necessarily have the same employee coverage in rural areas as they do in urban areas. However, reliability of chargepoints in rural areas is arguably more critical to electric vehicle driver confidence since travel distances to alternative chargepoints are likely to be greater. Furthermore, if electric vehicle drivers are deterred from travelling in the area, it could have a negative impact on tourist flows and commercial fleet pass-through, thereby harming the local economy.
Presently, there are often contract conditions which prohibit repairs by unauthorised parties without invalidating the EVSE warranty, such that maintenance and fixes to chargepoints can only be carried out by the equipment manufacturer themselves.